"Feeding on Flames: The Politics of Tragedy in Media's Grip on the F-16 Crash"
- szymborskipiotr
- 5 hours ago
- 5 min read
In the blink of an eye, a rehearsal for the Radom Air Show 2025 turned into a national tragedy. On August 28, 2025, Major Maciej "Slab" Krakowian, an experienced F-16 pilot with over 1,200 hours in the cockpit, lost his life when his jet plummeted during an acrobatic maneuver, erupting into a fireball on the runway. The show, meant to showcase Poland's aerial prowess, was swiftly canceled, leaving a void filled not by silence, but by the relentless churn of news coverage. As I explored in my previous reflection on newsrooms' speed-versus-truth paradox, pain sells—and in today's hyper-polarized media landscape, death becomes a weapon. This crash exemplifies how outlets feed on suffering, twisting grief into sensationalism or political ammunition, often at the expense of facts and humanity.
Polish media dove in headfirst, amplifying the horror with videos and speculation. TVN24, with its center-left tilt and reputation for polished journalism, led the charge. They aired dramatic footage: "kilkadziesiąt sekund akrobacji i kula ognia" (dozens of seconds of acrobatics and a ball of fire), dissecting the crash from multiple angles. Experts weighed in on potential causes, from pilot error to a "black series" of past Radom disasters. But they escalated the frenzy by publishing purported leaked recordings of air traffic control (ATC) conversations with the pilot, highlighting confusion and controller mix-ups moments before the crash. The transcripts revealed a near-miss with an FA-50 jet, erroneous instructions, and chaotic communication—sensational details that painted a picture of systemic failure. Yet, these recordings remain unconfirmed by prosecutors, who haven't ruled out AI fabrication. Running with unverified material? That's not just speeding past verification—it's exploiting uncertainty for clicks, fueling public outrage in a society already skeptical of institutions.
Republika TV, unapologetically right-wing, took a different tack but ended up in the same exploitative waters. They honored the pilot as a hero: "pilot oddał życie za każdego z nas" (the pilot gave his life for each of us), linking his death to national defense. Coverage included updates on the black box recovery and a found camera potentially belonging to the pilot, adding investigative intrigue. But they seized on TVN24's leaked recordings—not to question their authenticity, but to weaponize them against their rivals. Framing the ATC chaos as evidence of government incompetence under the current administration, they attacked TVN24 for sensationalism while hypocritically amplifying the unverified audio to score political points. This isn't journalism; it's partisan warfare disguised as reporting. As I noted before, Republika's "House of Free Speech" claim rings hollow when graphics and narratives openly push agendas, turning tragedy into a tool for division.
Expanding beyond these, Onet.pl, one of Poland's leading news portals, ramped up the emotional stakes with headlines like "Dramatyczny wypadek polskiego F-16" (Dramatic accident of Polish F-16) and "Ostatnie nagranie pilota" (The pilot's last recording), featuring videos of the final moments and speculation on causes, including tower errors and the pilot's young age (35). They delved into the "black series" of crashes at Radom, emphasizing haunting visuals and human elements to draw in readers. While they didn't prominently feature the leaked ATC recordings in the same sensational way as TVN24—perhaps opting for more restrained reporting—their focus on graphic details and rapid updates still feeds into the morbidity, prioritizing clicks over calm analysis in a competitive digital space.
TVP.info, the public broadcaster often aligned with right-wing perspectives under previous governments, adopted a more formal and commemorative tone. They paid tribute to the pilot with articles on his awards and the military's farewell: "Pamięć musi być trwała" (Memory must endure), while listing historical disasters in a "czarna lista" (black list). Their coverage echoed investigation updates, like the recovered camera, but notably avoided amplifying the unconfirmed ATC leaks. Instead of politicizing the recordings, they stuck to factual reporting on the crash's aftermath, such as halted F-16 flights and official statements. This restraint might reflect a shift post-government change, but it still capitalizes on the tragedy's gravity to maintain viewership, blending national mourning with subtle agenda-setting.
Gazeta Polska Codziennie, a conservative daily, remained surprisingly muted on the incident. Searches yield no significant coverage, suggesting they either deprioritized it or avoided the frenzy altogether—perhaps to steer clear of the political minefield surrounding the leaks. In a landscape where silence can speak volumes, this lack of engagement contrasts with their usual vocal stance on national issues, leaving room for speculation on editorial choices.
Watch the moment of tragedy here:
Adding to the mix, Kanał Zero—an independent, opinion-driven YouTube channel founded by journalist Krzysztof Stanowski—jumped into the fray with high-viewership videos. Titles like "F-16 CRASH BEFORE AIR SHOW IN RADOM. PILOT DIDN'T SURVIVE. INVESTIGATION WILL BE IN PROCEEDING" garnered over 253K views, focusing on the dramatic sequence and the ongoing probe. Another piece, "MACIEJ 'SLAB' KRAKOWIAN - A FILM-THROWN LIFE STORY," humanized the pilot with a biographical angle, attracting attention through emotional storytelling. While not overtly political like Republika, their sensational titles and rapid uploads exploit the shock value, drawing massive audiences without clear emphasis on verifying details like the ATC leaks. As a digital-native outlet, Kanał Zero exemplifies how non-traditional media feeds on death for virality, blending journalism with entertainment in a way that blurs lines.
Internationally, the feeding frenzy was more visual and less entangled in Polish politics. Outlets like CBS News and Sky News replayed the fireball explosion, captioning it with "pilot killed" and "fireball explosion." The Daily Mail pushed a "haunting last picture" of the pilot minutes before, milking the personal tragedy. Al Jazeera and ABC News stayed factual, covering the canceled show and global shock, but included graphic clips without delving into the unverified ATC leaks, which remained a domestic hotspot. Even YouTube reactions from former pilots added layers—"shocking," "tragic"—amplifying the death for engagement. In restrained markets like the Netherlands (RTL, NOS), coverage might balance better, but globally, death drives traffic.
This crash isn't isolated—it's a microcosm of media's pain-for-profit model. TVN24's subtlety masks bias, Republika's bluntness exposes it, Onet and TVP blend facts with emotion, Gazeta stays silent, Kanał Zero viralizes it, and internationals globalize the spectacle. The leaked, unconfirmed recordings highlight the issue: sensationalized by some, weaponized by others, ignored by the rest—blurring journalism into politicshttps://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/7259584856437743616/ or entertainment. Sponsors thrive on views, but at what cost? We're sliding toward "pathostreams," where misery boosts ratings, echoing gladiatorial spectacles.
Yet, hope endures. In a digital age with VPNs and open platforms, audiences will fact-check and demand better. Media that prioritizes unverified sensationalism or partisan hits will erode trust and fade. From Poland to the Netherlands, viewers—as the ultimate regulators—will heal the system. Major Krakowian's legacy deserves dignified remembrance, not exploitation. Let's push for verification over velocity, truth over tragedy.
What are your thoughts on media's role in such events? Share below—let's discuss how we can foster accountable journalism.
-----
Piotr Szymborski
Stay updated — check our newsletter:
Comments